GST Filing Frequency AI Agent / LLM
BusinessEverything an AI coding assistant needs to write a working GST Filing Frequency integration without opening another page: endpoint, authentication, parameters, a real request, both response shapes and the platform rules it cannot infer from a single example. Copy the brief below and paste it into Claude, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT or any other agent.
Machine-readable spec — Markdown
# GST Filing Frequency API — Way2API®
- **Endpoint:** `POST https://app.way2api.com/api/v1/gst/filing-frequency`
- **Auth:** `Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY` (or `X-API-Key: YOUR_API_KEY`)
- **Content-Type:** `application/json`
- **Category:** Business
- **Availability:** Available in India
- **Docs:** https://app.way2api.com/documentation/gst-filing-frequency
## What it does
GST Filing Frequency API — Whether a GSTIN files its returns monthly or quarterly, quarter by quarter, for one financial year. Under the QRMP scheme a small taxpayer may switch preference between quarters, so the answer is a list: Q1 through Q4, each marked monthly or quarterly, alongside a derived filing_frequency that summarises the whole year as monthly, quarterly or mixed. It is the missing half of a GST compliance check: a GSTR-1 absent for a month is only late if that taxpayer files monthly, and treating a quarterly filer as delinquent is the most common false positive in supplier monitoring. Use it to time GSTR-2A / 2B reconciliation to each supplier's real cadence, set the right input tax credit expectation, and stop chasing returns that were never due.
## Request body (application/json)
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `gst_number` | string | yes | 15-character GSTIN, e.g. 03DOXPM4071K1ZE. Case-insensitive. |
| `financial_year` | string | yes | Indian financial year (April to March), 2017-18 onwards. Accepts 2023-24, 2023-2024 or 202324. |
## Example request
```bash
curl -X POST https://app.way2api.com/api/v1/gst/filing-frequency \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"gst_number":"03DOXPM4071K1ZE","financial_year":"2023-24"}'
```
## Success response — 200
```json
{
"status": "SUCCESS",
"status_code": 200,
"charged": true,
"success": true,
"message": "",
"message_code": "OK",
"order_id": "W2A1739512345abcdef01",
"data": {
"order_id": "W2A1739512345abcdef01",
"result": {
"gst_number": "03DOXPM4071K1ZE",
"financial_year": "2023-24",
"filing_frequency": "quarterly",
"quarters": [
{
"quarter": "Q1",
"frequency": "quarterly"
},
{
"quarter": "Q2",
"frequency": "quarterly"
},
{
"quarter": "Q3",
"frequency": "quarterly"
},
{
"quarter": "Q4",
"frequency": "quarterly"
}
]
}
}
}
```
## Error response — 422
```json
{
"status": "SUCCESS",
"status_code": 422,
"charged": true,
"success": false,
"message": "Invalid GSTIN",
"message_code": "VERIFICATION_FAILED",
"order_id": "W2A1739512345abcdef01",
"data": {
"order_id": "W2A1739512345abcdef01",
"error_code": "INVALID_GSTIN",
"result": {
"gst_number": "03DOXPM4071K1ZZ",
"financial_year": "2023-24",
"filing_frequency": "unknown",
"quarters": []
}
}
}
```
## Integration rules
- Every response is JSON carrying `status`, `status_code`, `charged`, `success`, `message`, `message_code` and (once a call reaches the provider) `order_id`. The verification payload is under `data.result`.
- `charged` (boolean) is the authority on billing. Do NOT infer it from the HTTP status: `422` is returned both for input we rejected (not charged) and for a lookup the provider ran and billed us for that returned a negative result (charged).
- `message_code` is a fixed vocabulary — branch on it instead of parsing `message`. Values: `OK`, `ACCEPTED`, `PROVIDER_NO_RESPONSE`, `VERIFICATION_FAILED`, `NO_RECORD_FOUND`, `INVALID_INPUT`, `REQUEST_FAILED`, `MISSING_API_KEY`, `INVALID_API_KEY`, `INSUFFICIENT_BALANCE`, `NO_API_ACCESS`, `NOT_FOUND`, `RATE_LIMITED`, `INTERNAL_ERROR`, `PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE`.
- `success` reports the verification outcome; `status` reports the ORDER lifecycle (`SUCCESS`/`PENDING`/`FAILED`). They differ on a charged negative result: the order completed and was billed while the verification did not pass.
- A failed verification is still a successful HTTP call — the outcome lives in the response body, so do not treat `200` as "verified".
- Status codes: `200` result returned, `202` pending or provider did not respond (both charged — quote the `order_id`), `401` missing/invalid key, `402` insufficient balance, `403` no access to this service, `422` see `charged`, `429` rate limited (honour the `Retry-After` header), `503` temporarily unavailable.
- Rate limits are per API key, per service, on a 1-minute sliding window.
- Load the API key from an environment variable or secret store. Never hard-code it, never commit it, and never ship it in client-side code — calls must be made from your backend.
Prompts to pair it with
- Write a production-ready GST Filing Frequency integration in PHP using this spec, with error handling and retries.
- Given this spec, generate typed request/response models and a client class.
- Review my existing GST Filing Frequency integration against this spec and list what I handle incorrectly.
⚠ Before you paste generated code
Never let an assistant hard-code your API key — load it from an environment variable or a
secret store, and call this endpoint from your backend only. A failed verification is still a
successful HTTP call, so check the success field in the body
rather than treating 200 as verified.